It comes with the job, but it’s not something you’ll think about nor will it hit you until it sits squarely on your shoulders. Then gradually, you’ll begin to feel it more and more, up to the point where you don’t think you can take it much longer without making some adjustments.
Now this may sound like I’m talking about heavy stuff like responsibilities at work. But I am quite simply referring to this thing called weight. Or to be more precise, the combined weight of all the equipment my fellow photojournalists and I have to lug around each day as we go about our assignments.
It is nothing to make light of, that I can assure you. I have heard from a number of veterans who have developed varying degrees of shoulder and back problems as a result of carrying too much weight over the years. The most serious case involved an operation on the spine which left the photographer out of action for months on end.
Thus, I’m always mindful to consider any precautionary measures advised, so as to minimise the damage unto myself, lest regret should hit when it’s already too late. In any case, the aches on your shoulders will appeal to you directly to rethink your options.
Sample the following photo for an idea of what typically goes into our bags.

Essentially, there is the camera body, 3 lenses – the wide-angle, mid-range and telephoto, and a flash.
If you’re working the late shift, it is advisable to also bring along a laptop in case you need to send photos back to the office on-the-spot to make it in time for offstone for the newspaper.
Of course, this is not forgetting miscellaneous items like extra batteries, card reader, power plug for the laptop, pen and notebook and perhaps a foldable umbrella – all of which can add up to quite a bit.
On top of the above, sometimes there is a need too for a monopod and a 300mm (or longer) lens, but fortunately they are not part of our regular get-up and are required only for certain assignments based on our own judgement.
So you see, when I tell people my work is back-breaking, I mean it - literally.
Which brings us to our next consideration – the options out there to best carry all this weight.
From my observation, the bags of choice are either shoulder bags, backpacks or chest vests that resemble what NS men will refer to in the army as the SBO.

(L-R) The shoulder bag, backpack and chest vest
The first is by far the most popular among media photographers since it is the most convenient and comparatively fuss-free when it comes to the changing of lenses or retrieval of items which are needed in a hurry. This is important in this line of work as sometimes you need to react fast in order to capture a fleeting moment, something which may come right down to a split second.
That said however, in terms of bodily damage, I find shoulder bags are the worst because all the weight is essentially being supported only on one shoulder. On most days I carry a shoulder bag, but it is starting to get to me especially when it’s a day-long shoot. I can’t help but wonder if one day, one of my shoulders will end up being lower than the other. That is if I don’t end up in the operating theatre first!
The other disadvantage of a shoulder bag is that it tends to swing about quite a bit when you run – and there will be the occasions when you have to give chase – so that can be rather uncomfortable. And when you are in a scrum or a tight space, or when you have to squat for that shot, the bag can really get in the way.
Backpacks on the other hand, are just the opposite in what they have to offer. They provide some relief as the weight is distributed on both shoulders, but the downside is that they are clumsy for equipment retrievals and might cause you to miss your shot. To add to that, I personally do not like how continuous rubbing of the bag against the back of my T-shirts often result in damage to the fabric (of my T-shirts, that is) in certain areas. Shoulder bags pose this problem too, but instead of the back, it’s damage at the side from which the bag is slung. This is not so much a problem with the design of the bag actually - the culprit is the slightly rough material used for the contact areas between your bag and your body.
I have not tried the chest vest, the third option, but from another photojournalist who used to wear it, it is a good compromise between the shoulder bag and the backpack. You can reach for your items quite easily and at the same time, the weight is balanced on both shoulders. Also, it hangs quite securely around your waist and doesn’t move about much when you have to run – which is possibly the reason why the army adopted this design for its SBO.
But before you rejoice, take note that it too has its shortcomings. One of which is that several chest vest designs don’t come with a pouch at the back, or one that is big enough to fit a laptop in. So you might end up having to carry a separate bag just for the laptop.
As for me, I have arrived at the conclusion that there is no ideal camera bag out there that fits my every need perfectly. Not just yet, that is.
So consider this as a really late (or very early) Christmas wish: I would be thrilled if someone would come up with a design that allows for a shoulder bag to be easily converted into a backpack, and vice versa. And yes, it had best be made from a material that isn’t abrasive so friction won’t damage your clothes. And if it should look stylish too, that would be a bonus..
Well, it’s either that or a light-weight, compact 16 – 200mm f/2.8 lens. Photojournalists the world over will be eternally grateful to you, Santa.
Tags: camera bag